Research / provenance / source review

Research Evidence Verification.

Review a claim without flattening its sources into a single confidence score. The tool keeps provenance, contradictions and unresolved evidence separate so another researcher or agent can inspect the basis of the result.

Evidence is kept attached to its source and role. Contradiction, absence and uncertainty are distinct states. The output is designed to be reviewed, not treated as an oracle.

Public utilityApify

Run the tool

The current public runtime is distributed through Apify, with API access for automated workflows.

Open on Apify ↗
Common tasks04

Where it fits

  • Source and claim review
  • OSINT evidence packets
  • Research QA
  • Agent-readable provenance

The boundary of the tool matters as much as the result. These are the assumptions we do not hide.

Is this a fact-checking oracle?

No. It structures the evidence for review and makes unresolved conflicts explicit.

Does it preserve provenance?

Yes. Source identity and the relation between a claim and its evidence remain part of the result.

Can agents consume the result?

Yes. The structured output is intended for downstream research and decision workflows.

The utilities share a preference for explicit inputs, visible unknowns and machine-readable output.